<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Broadband Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donkasprzak.com/2008/04/30/national-broadband-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donkasprzak.com/2008/04/30/national-broadband-policy/</link>
	<description>Conversations regarding Globalization, Internet2 and Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: donkasprzak</title>
		<link>http://donkasprzak.com/2008/04/30/national-broadband-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>donkasprzak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donkasprzak.com/2008/04/30/national-broadband-policy/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>The initial push should be fiber based so at the home it will remain an initial wired solution.  As DraftN matures or WiFiMax enters the picture the migration to wireless will continue...but boy at some point all the energy going wireless will melt our ears.  

Cables aside, the telcom providers need to be savvy enough to charge home users a fair monthly fee.  The Minnesota $150/month for 50MB is just outrageous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The initial push should be fiber based so at the home it will remain an initial wired solution.  As DraftN matures or WiFiMax enters the picture the migration to wireless will continue&#8230;but boy at some point all the energy going wireless will melt our ears.  </p>
<p>Cables aside, the telcom providers need to be savvy enough to charge home users a fair monthly fee.  The Minnesota $150/month for 50MB is just outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://donkasprzak.com/2008/04/30/national-broadband-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donkasprzak.com/2008/04/30/national-broadband-policy/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Do you think this will come in the form of new cabling brought to everyone or will it possibly be wireless? Or a combination of the two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think this will come in the form of new cabling brought to everyone or will it possibly be wireless? Or a combination of the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

